Andrew McAfee's Blog - Latest Comments in Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

agensbobet — Mon, 05 Jan 2015 01:50:50 -0000

After read a couple of the articles on your website these few days, and I truly like your style of blogging. I tag it to my favorites internet site list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my web site also and let me know what you think. 77Dewa SITUS JUDI POKER dan DOMINO ONLINE INDONESIA TERPERCAYA 77Dewa SITUS JUDI POKER dan DOMINO ONLINE INDONESIA TERPERCAYA 77Dewa SITUS JUDI POKER dan DOMINO ONLINE INDONESIA TERPERCAYA 77Dewa SITUS JUDI POKER dan DOMINO ONLINE INDONESIA TERPERCAYA 77Dewa SITUS JUDI POKER dan DOMINO ONLINE INDONESIA TERPERCAYA Download Au Mobile Indo Mod Apk Terbaru Au Mobile Indo Mod Apk Au Mobile Indo Mod Mod Au Mobile Indo Mod Apk Kontes Seo Agen Bola Poker Kontes Seo Bola Poker Mas Gie Bisnis Indonesia
agen sbobet agen ibcbet agen sbobet agen ibcbet cara bermain sbobet agen poker online indonesia poker online game poker permainan poker poker uang asli dewa poker cara bermain poker agen bola sbobet agen bola agen bola online situs agen bola online agen bola tangkas agen bola judi bola agen sbobet

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

Fernando Ferreira — Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:34:41 -0000

Yea ! i like that of my client GigaSpaces. thank you!
reciclar

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

görüntülü chat — Tue, 17 May 2011 10:29:06 -0000

IMO it should be services BASED architecture. Much easier to understand
and closer to reality from what I see in the field.

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

görüntülü chat — Tue, 17 May 2011 10:28:01 -0000

business leaders need to be educated and be willing to support/admit
the value of freeform social software as an enterprise software tool
that delivers real personal and team productivity gains.

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

Jakekok23 — Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:36:10 -0000

ciao!,
I still think they’re incredibly useful tools for business leaders. But I do think it’s critical for leaders to be clear about when they’re imposing structure and when they’re letting it emerge.

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

modular homes — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:49:16 -0000

the Web 2.0 technologies are helping to create rich interactive front ends to SOA back-end systems.

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

kris — Wed, 16 May 2007 03:41:21 -0000

The reason this is so confusing is the use of ORIENTED in the TLA. WhatÂ’s that about? Is it akin to some form of IT sexual orientation? Is it an optional response? WTF does it mean?? IMO it should be services BASED architecture. Much easier to understand and closer to reality from what I see in the field.

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

Paul Reeves — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:50:32 -0000

2 points:
1. unstructured data invites a non-egalitarian system as it discourages usage by people unable to quickly and effectively parse poorly written text (good writing is revision and sweat).

2. Structures evolve from previous structures. I do not think they emerge. The lack of structure in data means the data is not useful in the enterprise. Enterprise wikis, for example, should provide configurable structures and workflows for data to be truly useful. Provide a decision making template that groups can use to propose, debate, select and monitor a policy over time and you have a killer app.
As long as the structure provides for basic and complex data types, it can evolve as necessary.

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

Tomasz — Sat, 14 Oct 2006 07:17:50 -0000

Your definitions of - and comparisons between - SOA and Enterprise 2.0 Social Software identify some important differences. It seems to me that for the true potential of Enterprise 2.0 to emerge, business leaders need to be educated and be willing to support/admit the value of freeform social software as an enterprise software tool that delivers real personal and team productivity gains.

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

Randall Cronk — Wed, 24 May 2006 18:20:22 -0000

"Even SOA proponents agree that there's no recent tech breakthroughs that make it a more achievable vision now than it was before . . . "

I disagree. You might check out space-based virtualization schemes like that of my client GigaSpaces. They encapsulate both middleware and legacy apps in dynamically extensible runtime environments that talk to each other via a JavaSpaces implementation. You can pretty much turn anything into a service without doing a major rewrite or creating a lot of upfront rules. Given that kind of freedom, you might find SOA and Enterprise 2.0 more philosophically in tune than is first apparent. See my post here: http://www.greatwriting.com...

Re: Enterprise 2.0 vs. SOA

Bruce MacVarish — Tue, 23 May 2006 14:37:38 -0000

Great article Professor McAfee.

Do have any case studies or examples that could help illustrate the impact that enterprise class social software has on personal and/or team productivity?